Back to insights

Corporate and commercial ·

Director liability for company debts in Spain: the four doors

A Spanish limited company limits the shareholder's liability, not the director's. These are the four routes by which a creditor reaches the personal assets of whoever signs, and what can be done before they do.

A judge's gavel resting on an open book

There is a sentence repeated in accountants' offices that has cost a lot of people a lot of money: "relax, it is a limited company". It is true for the shareholder, who risks what they put in. It is false for the director, who answers with their own assets every time one of these four doors opens.

They are not theoretical. All four are used daily, and all four are investigated the same way: someone reconstructs after the fact, with the accounts in front of them, what you knew and when you knew it.

First door: the corporate action, where the company suffers the harm

This is brought by the company itself, or by a shareholder in its place, where management has damaged the company's assets. Its basis lies in articles 236 and following of the Spanish Companies Act: directors are liable for damage caused by acts contrary to the law or to the articles, or performed in breach of the duties of office, provided there was wilful misconduct or negligence.

Two points that decide cases. First, the de facto director is also liable, that is, whoever actually runs the company without having been appointed, and article 236.3 says so expressly. Putting a nominee in the post protects nobody. Second, the minority may bring the action directly. Article 239 gives standing to shareholders representing at least 5 % of the capital where the company does not act, and in cases of breach of the duty of loyalty without having to put it to the general meeting first.

There is a solid and under-used defence on the other side: the business judgment rule of article 226. An unfortunate strategic decision does not generate liability if it was taken in good faith, with no personal interest, on sufficient information and through an adequate decision-making procedure. The law protects those who get it wrong having done it properly. And that is proved with minutes, reports and emails, not with statements.

Second door: the individual action, where the creditor suffers the harm

This is article 241: the action available to shareholders or third parties for acts of directors that directly harm their interests. An unpaid creditor cannot simply invoke it; they must show direct damage, a specific act of the director and the link between the two. The textbook example is the de facto closure: the company stops trading, the assets disappear and nobody liquidates anything.

Both actions are time-barred four years after they could have been brought, under article 241 bis.

Third door: article 367, the most dangerous and the most avoidable

This one requires no proof of damage, fault or causation. It works almost as a penalty and is, by a distance, the one that has taken the most personal estates with it.

The mechanism is as follows. Where a statutory ground for dissolution arises, the director has two months to call the general meeting that resolves upon it, or to apply for judicial dissolution or insolvency where appropriate. If they do not, article 367 makes them jointly and severally liable for company obligations arising after that ground arose. And the law presumes debts are subsequent unless the director proves otherwise.

The ground that is almost always triggered without anyone noticing is article 363.1(e): losses that reduce net equity to less than half of the share capital. It is worth reading slowly, because what starts the clock is not a missed payment, nor insolvency proceedings, nor a claim from anyone: it is a number on the balance sheet. A company still invoicing, paying salaries and serving its clients may have been in that position for fourteen months without its director knowing.

The reassuring part is that it is easy to switch off: by calling the meeting in time, or by restoring the equity balance through shareholder contributions, a capital increase, the capitalisation of participating loans or a capital reduction. All of that works beforehand. None of it works once a claim has been made.

Fourth door: the tax authorities, social security and insolvency

The first three are civil. The fourth is not, and it collects fastest.

Article 43.1 of the Spanish General Tax Act passes secondary liability for the company's tax debts to the director in two frequent scenarios: where they failed to take the steps necessary for tax compliance or consented to the breach by those reporting to them, and where the company has ceased trading leaving obligations outstanding. Social security follows equivalent logic with contributions.

In insolvency, a finding that the insolvency was culpable can end in an order to cover, in whole or in part, the shortfall, plus disqualification. It gets predictably worse where insolvency was not filed within two months of knowing of it, where books or accounts are missing, or where assets were disposed of to the detriment of creditors.

What actually protects you

Over the years, the people who come out of this well did the same five things, and none of them is expensive:

  • Check net equity every quarter, not once a year at closing. It is the trigger for article 367 and it takes five minutes to work out.
  • Document important decisions: minutes, a prior report, the alternatives considered. That is what turns a bad decision into a decision protected by article 226.
  • Do not operate with an expired board and keep the appointment registered. A resignation that is not registered still has effect against third parties acting in good faith.
  • Resign properly and in writing when you leave, with formal notice to the company, calling a meeting to fill the vacancy. A verbal resignation does not exist.
  • Take out directors' liability insurance with legal defence cover. Its real value is not the indemnity: it is having your lawyer paid from day one.

If you are unsure whether your balance sheet has already crossed the article 363.1(e) line, that is a thirty-minute consultation, not a hundred-page report. And it is infinitely cheaper now than in a year's time.

This article contains general information for informative purposes and does not constitute legal advice or an investment recommendation. The rules cited may have been amended after publication; always check the text in force before taking a decision.

Does what you have just read affect you? The initial consultation lasts thirty minutes and ends with a concrete recommendation.

Book a consultation
Newsletter

Get every new article by email

Only when we publish. No advertising, and one-click unsubscribe.